No. 14 - Gone With The Wind (Victor Fleming, 1939)
Ranked #60
'Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn' - Rhett Butler
Years in the wilderness, endless casting auditions for the role of Scarlett, directors replaced, several sackings all over, the largest price paid for a debut novel, reluctant lead actor and one massive headache for everyone involved, Gone With The Wind had a lot to live up too and boy did it ever deliver. Since the day that producer David O. Selznick paid $50,000 for Margeret Mitchell's debut novel, 'Gone With the Wind', a frenzied circus has surrounded the epic saga ever since.
Published in 1936, ten years after Margeret Mitchell first started the massive tome, Gone With the Wind became an instant best seller, winning the Pulitzer Prize in 1937. Plans for the film adaptation were already underway and the huge task of finding a actress that was able to fulfill the role of southern belle Scarlett O'Hara were already proving difficult. Gone With the Wind is as infamous for it's final product as it is for it's audition reels, an endless stream of talented actresses were linked or auditioned for the part, including Lana Turner, Susan Hayward and Joan Bennett before relatively unknown, at the time, English actress Vivian Leigh snagged the part in 1938.
Fast forward to 8:20 to see the audition reels for Scarlett O'Hara
Scarlett decides she will confess her love to Ashley at a barbecue party being held at his family plantation, in admitting her feelings; in typical Scarlett style, Ashley admits to having feelings for her but, quite wisely, states that Melanie makes a better wife. Witnessing this exchange is the irrepressible Rhett Butler (Clark Cable), smart mouthed, cynical and more than a match for Scarlett, he slowly, much to his better judgment, falls in love with her; obviously spotting similar qualities in her that he possesses. Their first meeting is as heated as it will continue to be throughout, snapping at each other with this delicious trade off:
Scarlett "You, Sir, are no gentleman,"
Rhett "And you, miss, are no lady."
Scarlett with Mammy (Hattie McDaniel)Gone With The Wind is a film of two halves, quite literally having an intermission separating the epic. The first of which is often captivating and thrilling covering the time period of the Civil War and Sherman's march through Atlanta that lives up to the films epic reputation. The scenes covering the siege of Atlanta whilst Melanie gives birth are nerve wrangling and deftly executed. In escaping, with the aid of Rhett, from the ravished city we are treated to the films finest set pieces; the shot of the burning house in the background as the flee for their lives displaying love and loss on a grand scale and that haunting shot of 'the field of the dead', which will long live in the memory, carefully depicts a hopeless cause in face of the inevitable.
Scarlett walking through the field of the deadA romanticised, sentimental version of historical events about the 'good ole' south, with slavery, and all references to 'negroes' and the Ku Klux Klan omitted from the script, Gone With The Wind paints a picture of plantation life that could only have been made possible by the exploitation of this excluded race. Mitchell's original novel was sanitised for the big screen in order not to upset mainstream audiences, as well as some high ranking officials still affiliated with white supremacist groups. The nominal black characters such as Mammy and Prissy (Butterfly McQueen) are shown to be happy with their lot in life and probably better off in this mythical world.
However, what else was I supposed to expect? Given the original text, the era of which this was made and the amount of money behind it, Gone With The Wind was never going to be anything other than mythic tales of a world long gone. It's this vivid romantic style that sweeps the viewer off their feet from the very beginning and in parts this film is simply astonishing and quite ahead of its time. The cinematography, at times, is breath-taking and Leigh and Gable simply fizzle whenever they're on the screen together, sexual chemistry oozing from every possible pore. Same can't be said however of co-star Leslie Howard as the wet, insipid Ashely who feels as if he's strolling through the film and other characters such as Melanie, Mammy and Prissy are nothing more than fodder to keep the story moving.
Can you guess the line?




















10 baring their soul:
This is one of those films that I watched when I was too young to appreciate it.
I really need to revisit it.
I also would be willing to go through this again - if it wouldn't take me half a day to do it...
"The second half, by comparison, feels flabby and over melodramatic"
I agree. The movie took a uneven turn towards soap opera towards the end. But still, I think it's an excellent film and Vivian Leigh is really fantastic.
The first time I saw this movie I was so cynical towards it and its sweeping, Souther, melodramatic intentions that I told myself I hated it. A couple years later, I gave it another try and really got swept up by it. You bring up some good points about the film. There is just no denying the impact this film still has and sheer ravishment it provides, especially to those from the South. Bits and pieces may drive everyone crazy, but there is plenty to get caught up in.
My take on GWTW is that anyone who seriously loves American cinema should watch it at least once. But it's not the kind of film that I personally enjoy revisiting and studying in depth, as I do with Citizen Kane for example.
Teehee, it looks like there are boom mics visible two images up. :-)
Hey, Ib ... this flick was revered around my house. I first saw it at one of the periodic revivals it had when I was a youth. I have the restored version on DVD, and found it to be about as I remembered it, only with this overlay of bad vibes at the racism.
That crane shot at the train station still gets to me, though ...
Thanks for all the comments guys.
Cinexcellence - What happened to Jospeh? That was easier to type? ;) Seriously it's a film that every serious film fan should watch at some point in adulthood. Make sure you have a loooooong time to watch it in though. As for the boom, that's what I thought! That made me laugh.
Daniel G - Tell me about it. I was surprised by how quickly it went by though.
Marin - I agree, it was still an entertaining film despite the second half dragging a little.
James - Welcome to the site. Exactly, it's a real 'event' movie, so much of it is exciting and captivating. As I pointed out it's getting on for 70 years and to hold peoples attention still in that way, that's an accomplishment in itself.
Rick R - I totally agree with that, I can't see myself going through this again any time soon. As for Citizen Kane, it's now been three years since I saw it last, I believe I'll be watching that again real soon.
Rick O - It feels like there was a time when I was young where this film was on every bloody week. My mum and nan would watch it over and over.
I do find the racism subtext hard to stomach, it never sits comfortable with me despite knowing the era in which it was made.
Ditto on the train station shot, it really comes out of nowhere doesn't it?
I'm watching this as I type this. I'll read your review when I finish. Only 14 hours to go!
-Whitney
dearjesus.wordpress.com
My first post on Ibetolis' site after so many friendships on other networks.
First let me say nice blog.
Second, I love Gone With The Wind. I read the book before seeing the film. I've got the four disc set. This is one of the instances, however, where the source material exceeds the film incarnation.
Post a Comment