David Cronenberg, 2007
Still reveling in body horror, the excess of human behaviour, the perverse and the profane, Cronenberg has rightly earned his international reputation as an astute director and auteur. Learning his trade with a string of low-budget horror films, in which intelligent and genuinely shocking images awed audiences time after time, Cronenberg has escaped being pigeon-holed by working in other genres with relative ease; mostly with successful results. Following on for the widespread success of A History of Violence; his 2005 film about a one man's attempt to hide from his violent past, Eastern Promises again establishes his versatility and touches on the themes he's explored for the past 35 years.
Set in a murky underworld of

Anna, having suffered a miscarriage some months before, strikes up a bond with the child, and on finding a diary written by the mother, something she was clutching before she died, Anna decides to track down the nearest relative to the young girl before the child becomes lost in the social care system. In the process of getting the diary translated, from it's original Russian, Anna finds a business card of a restaurant amongst the pages, hoping someone can help her trace the girls family she decides to give the place a visit. The address leads Anna to meet restaurateur Semyon (Armin-Mueller-Stahl), an elderly Russian whose warm welcome masks the horrific part he plays in the poor girls life. In being introduced to Seymon we enter the world of the Vory V Zakone (Russian Mafia); who adorn their bodies with a series of tattoos; symbols that represent their standing in the organisation.
A mystical, almost intense, reference surrounds the adorning of these tattoos for the Vory V Zakone; a series of fierce, colourless symbols, placed in symbolic parts of the body by rank and accomplishment; much like an army officer with a chest full of medals. This is vintage Cronenberg territory; transgression and body transmogrification in full swing. We witness an almost erotic scene in which Nikolai (Viggo Mortensen), in the midst of being tattooed, half naked, lying back, casually smoking a cigarette, is perfectly at one with the needle, the ink almost caressing his body.
Nikolai receiving the totemic tattoos
Despite a first-rate screenwriter, Steven Knight, who also delved into similar territory about the plight of the migrant underclass with a previous script for Dirty Pretty Things (2002), plus the huge talent of Cronenberg, all too often the film feels clunky, cluttered and bereft of drama. The casting for instance is something of a puzzler, casting an Australian as a Brit and using a Frenchman and an American as Russian gangsters, whose accents from time to time wander into stereotype land, something that began to grate towards the end of the film; the biggest sinner being Vincent Cassel playing Seymon's son Kirill, often too big and too bombastic, his character soon becomes archetypal and clichéd. Mortensen on the other hand plays Nikolia with powerful, understated menace, a peruser of carnage who could, from the look of him, either hug you or rip off your head.
Surprisingly, for Cronenberg, Eastern Promises feels muted, understated, lacking in depth and missing his bold brush strokes. Scenes of greatness flicker sporadically and moments of sheer horror; a scene in which Nikolia clips the fingers off a corpse or that first opening murder, are few and far between. So it's with annoyance, rather than celebration, that we witness one of Cronenberg's finest moments; Nikolia's naked fight, with two fully dressed assassins in a public bath-house. This amazing scene, honest in his brutality and fierceness, feels like it sprung out of a different film, such stark and brave film-making feels so out of place in this otherwise turgid, plodding tale.





















7 baring their soul:
I actually enjoyed this, but you're right: it wasn't nearly as explosive as the buzz would have you believe.
Eastern Promises was one of my favorite movies last year. My friend and I walked out of the theatre saying, "Viggo IS Russian." He was brilliant.
The rest of the movie is slightly imperfect and yea, Vincent Cassell does what he does best, being larger than life, but I really didn't get much from Naomi Watts and I love her. I just didn't think she was as impressive as she's been in other movies, even ones that are wrose, like 21 Grams.
But a great, great movie and I hope Cronenberg keeps making more films like it.
Fails to hit the target on nearly all fronts?
I agree with you that the ending is weak, but Cronenberg does successfully evoke a world of a lesser known criminal organization and night London streets. He draws from Viggo Mortenson another excellent performance after The History of Violence (which ends better perhaps due to the help of William Hurt). He also creates some interesting romantic tension between Nikolai and Anna. All of these elements helped me like the film in spite of its flaws.
Thanks for the comments.
Nayana - I really wanted to enjoy it, I'm a big fan of Cronenberg but this left me feeling flat. So much of it was under whelming and it never really got going for me.
Michael - Love the profile pic! To be fair to Watts, she actually had nothing to do in this film, it was a real waste of her talents. Agree about Mortensen, it was an impressive display and a great accent.
Fdr - Maybe I'm being a little harsh but the film reeked of inauthenticity and I couldn't get past the stereotyping.
It's far too flawed for me to enjoy any of the strong parts.
Welcome to the site by the way.
Hey, Ib -- I enjoyed the flick, and didn't notice the stereotyping. What I liked most was Viggo Mortensen's ferocious performance, it is one of the most intense I've seen in recent years.
Different strokes!
Rick - It does feel like I'm on my own about this one, I just couldn't abide much of it. I don't know what it is, apart from what I wrote in the review, that I found so disagreeable but there you have it.
Like you say different strokes.
Viva la difference.
apologies for trolling an old post but i felt compelled to comment having just watched it on dvd: yours is the only review ive read that have not been overly positive, which i'm inclined to agree with. very good in aspects but largely overrated. brilliant in parts but put together, marred by the horrible anticlimactic ending. i get they show great compassion at the end to contrast with the brutal bathhouse scene but the nagging feeling like they cheated the audience with a proper payoff persist. still, interesting watch thanks to understated yet great performance all around.
Post a Comment