19 August 2009

The Year 2004: Sideways (Alexander Payne)

Counting Down The Zeroes welcomes Pat, of the fabulous Doodad Kind of Town, back to the project with yet another brilliant submission, check out her blog for more of the same. This time round Pat takes on Alexander Payne's latest comedy-drama, Sideways, about two friends who take a week long road-trip through Santa Barbara wine country. Almost reinvigorating the wine industry single handedly and winning a host of awards for it's sharp script, Sideways became the darling of the independent cinema scene in 2004 and for Pat, the allure has remained but the original infatuation has waned to revel an engaging, heart-warming and good, but not great, movie.

There are some films you love the first time you see them; you come back to revisit them a few years later and are delighted to find fresh nuances, deeper insights, moments that touch your heart or your funny bone more deeply than you'd been able to appreciate in the first viewing.

There are some films you love the first time you see them; you revisit them a few years later and are dismayed to find that they don't live up to your happy memories. The moments you cherished on the first viewing seem curiously flat and disappointing the second time through.

And then there are movies like "Sideways."

I loved this film to pieces when I first saw it in 2004. After re-watching it for the first time in five years, I still enjoyed it tremendously, but can't say I found anything new or surprising within. It remains a solidly entertaining, well-acted, character-driven comedy that strikes all the right notes from pathos to raunchy humor. But it's not a classic for the ages.

All of which is not intended as damnation by faint praise. There's something immensely joyful and comforting in revisiting characters you've enjoyed spending time with before and finding them just as maddening and interesting and lovable when you re-encounter them again years later. "Sideways" achieved that for me, and that's not an achievement to be dismissed lightly.

For the uninitiated, "Sideways" is the tale of two longtime friends. Miles and Jack, making a last "bachelor's" trip together to California's wine country before Jack's wedding. In standard fashion, that trip will ultimately test their friendship and push them both to become a little better men by the time the closing credits roll. It's also a whole lot of fun to be along for that ride, not least because what constitutes a successful trip varies so wildly according to the two men's points of view.

Miles (Paul Giamatti) is a perpetually morose and miserable would-be writer and oenophile, still pining for his ex-wife. His agenda for the trip is to "drink some good wines, play some golf and relax" while teaching his buddy the finer points of wine appreciation. Jack (Thomas Hayden Church) on the other hand, is an affable, nearly washed-up actor and unrepentant ladies man who can't tell a pinot from a zinfandel and wants little more from the trip to get both Miles and himself laid.


There's an undeniably by-the-numbers yin and yang to these characters. (Miles is the pessimist, Jack is the optimist. Miles is the intellectual whose idea of good time is doing the New York Times crossword puzzle in ink, Jack is incapable of thought deeper than "Let's party!" Miles is the moralistic buzzkill, Jack is just wants everybody to have good time and deal with the consequences later.) It's to the credit of both Giamatti and Hayden Church (as well as writer/director Alexander Payne) then that these characters and their story arc never get stale or entirely predictable; their friendship feels real and lived-in. I like that we aren't given much back story on how these two became and remained friends, other than that they were freshman-year roommates at San Diego State. The actors, under Payne's skillful direction, fill in those blanks for us through the nuances of their performances.

Giamatti, with his sloping shoulders and basset hound eyes, is a perfect embodiment of the sad and beaten down Miles. He finds the subtle layers in Miles' arrogance, desperation and emotional pain and plays them so nakedly and honestly that his misery is sometimes painful to witness. (As in the scenes where Miles wrestles with his own self-loathing before getting up the nerve to kiss the woman of his dreams or drunk-dials his ex-wife. Or especially in the late scene where Miles, having learned that his ex-wife is not only happily remarried but pregnant, grabs his prized bottle of 1961 Chateau Cheval Blanc and sneaks it into a fast-food restaurant, swigging it between bites of a burger and onion rings; it's heartbreaking and squirm-inducing at the same time, and Giamatti doesn't back off from awfulness of it at all.)

For his part, Hayden Church brings to Jack both a breezy spontaneity and a lovable dufus quality that keeps you laughing out loud. Jack is loathsome and lovable in equal measures; he can charms the pants off you, but he's not to be trusted. And at the same time, we can't help but like him because -whatever deceptions he tries to pull over on the women in his life - he never gives up on Miles. It's the only evidence of depth and a capacity for commitment that the character evinces; thankfully, Hayden Church plays this unflagging loyalty lightly and unself-consciously.

The flaws in Jack, however, point to what could be considered the flaw in "Sideways": the female characters are a tad one-dimensional, and to my mind, not nearly as well-served by the film's script as as the travelling buddies. Virginia's Madsen's Maya, the waitress/graduate student with whom Miles briefly and tentatively finds affection, has a nice warmth and wariness. Yet for all the sweet soulfulness Madsen brings to it, Maya still feels like an undercooked Dream Girl role. It's never really clear why someone as beautiful and seemingly well-balanced as Maya would be drawn to such an unquestionably complicated and unhappy man such as Miles, although there's never a question as to what Miles sees in Maya.

The two characters connect most memorably in the scene where they share what they most love about good wine. Miles has an affinity for pinots, as he explains to Maya, because the grapes are so sensitive, requiring special, tender care and cultivation in order to produce good flavor (not unlike Miles himself). Maya talks glowingly about how when she drinks wine, she imagines all the people who have been involved in making it, and concludes by declaring "And it tastes so fucking good." Madsen, the blond curls framing her face subtly backlit as if a halo, is radiant as she delivers this monologue in a hushed and honeyed tone of voice, and we can see why Miles falls in love with her at that moment. And there's enough intelligence in Madsen's performance that we get a hint of why Miles erudition and articulateness might interest her. But even in this scene, the purported mutual attraction feels unbalanced.


Sandra Oh, the sassy wine pourer for whom Jack very nearly derails his engagement has a nice, peppery screen presence - but her character is even less dimensional than Madsen's. She's little more than a standard-issue Sexy Spitfire, an excellent foil for Jack but not around enough for us to see beyond that. I'd have loved for her to have more to do than just beat Hayden Church's face to a pulp with her motorcycle helmet after she learns he's getting married, bracing as that beatdown is to watch.

Beyond my affection for these characters, "Sideways" is a treat from me - someone who knows little about wine - just to be drawn into the esoteric, slightly exotic world of wine appreciation. There's an early scene in while Miles teaches Jack how to taste wine: how to swirl it in the glass to "open it up," how to sniff the bouquet. Miles finds all sorts of notes in his glass of pinot: "citrus, strawberries, oak, a soupcon of a nutty Edam cheese," where Jack just looks confused and keeps sniffing earnestly until he can at least detect "Strawberries, yeah." This scene and others like it tickle me silly. Many have tried to educate me about wine, but I have no nose whatsoever. I'm just as likely to be satisfied with a bottle of Three Buck Chuck as a fine pinot, but I'm always fascinated by the people who can make the distinction. Thankfully, you don't need an appreciation of wine to have an appreciation of "Sideways;" its tart humor and bruised heart are accessible to all.

7 baring their soul:

MovieMan0283 said...

A very good, well-rounded assessment. I've always had my reservations about Payne films, but this was the warmest and most humanist of his films. I wonder why he hasn't made a feature since.

J.D. said...

I really love how SIDEWAYS, in some respects, is a throwback to character-driven films from the 1970s like SCARECROW and THE LAST DETAIL. The writing is top notch and you really get to know these characters and feel, by film's end, that you've been on a real journey with them.

Plus, the film made me fall in love with Virginia Madsen all over again. Man, she is so good in this film and I kinda wish Payne would make another film exploring where her relationship with Giamatti's character might have gone.

Pat said...

Movie Man,

Thanks. I agree with you that this is Payne's warmest film.

JD - I like the analogies you draw between "Sideways" and the other films. I have to admit, I have never seen "Scarecrow," although I think it is somewhere in my Netflix queue.

movies said...

a very spectacular movie...
one of the greatest movie ever created that really booms on one's mind... it is for those who can relate on its story

Jenifer said...

I agree with you that this is Payne's warmest film.
___________________
Jenifer
LaserShield Wireless Home Alarm Security Systems

Margaret Benbow said...

This was a very thoughtful post. Thank you. I too changed my mind slightly on a re-viewing. For example, I'd thought Paul Giamatti was robbed of an Oscar nomination he deserved for his fine performance, while Hayden Church got one; but when I took another look, "Jack" inhabited his role with such huge gusto, every note dead-on perfect of this selfish, happy hedonist who always has and always will land on his feet (or someone's feet). It's an enormously enjoyable performance.
In regard to Maya, I accepted that she was attracted to Miles because she saw him as creative--a "Writer"--and a fellow wine-maniac, and maybe also a good guy (after her difficult marriage). But you're right, it's a bit of a stretch.
I keep changing my mind, toward the end, about whether it's a sad or happy thing that Miles drinks his cherished vintage wine in the fast-food joint with the burger! Can an action be life-affirming and totally pathetic at the same time? But Maya did tell him to stop saving the wine--that the right time to enjoy it was right now--and that's what he's doing. So I guess that, once again, I'll trust wise Maya.

Pat said...

Margaret,

Thanks for you kind and thoughful comments. I love this: "happy hedonist who always has and always will land on his feet (or someone's feet). . That's a wonderful image!

And I totatlly agree that Giamatti was robbed at Oscar time. As I recall, he got a supporting nod a year later for "Cinderella Man" that felt very much like a conciliatory gesture on the part of the academy.

Interesting take on the fast food/Cheval Blanc scene. It's never played as anything but pathetic to me, but your take on that is one worth considering.